Parents brought their children’s favorite toys to the Kulick Community Center in Ferndale on Saturday to have their toys tested for lead and other toxic chemicals.
The event was put on by the Ecology Center of Ann Arbor and Michigan state senator Gilda Jacobs. The guest speakers were The Ecology Center’s Policy Director Mike Shriberg and toxic chemical specialist Dr. Mike Harbut.
Much of the recent interest in unsafe chemicals comes amidst recent recalls of toys with unsafe levels of lead paint. The Ecology Center is one of many consumer advocacy organizations across the country that has been spearheading efforts to get dangerous chemicals out of everyday products.
Currently Federal law only regulates lead paint. Any paint that exceeds 600 ppm is illegal, to put this into perspective, according to The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP): any products that exceed 40 ppm are unsafe.
Recently Michigan passed a law banning all products that have levels of lead exceeding 600 ppm. Part of the package of the recent legislation includes the formation of the Michigan Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Control Commission. The Lead Commission will assess by the end of this March whether the 600 ppm ban on children's products is a low enough level.
Both Harbut and Shriberg want the Lead Commission to set lead levels as low as possible. According to Harbut “Lead serves no useful purpose to the human body…The general scientific standard is, there is no such thing as a safe level” Shriberg was quick to point out that much of the record recalls last year were voluntary toy recalls “because the Federal government actually lacks many of the tools to do this.”
Shriberg is concerned about the lack of disclosure to consumers: “…there is a huge gap here in information for parents and consumers of all types…There’s not even disclosure requirements between the retailer so the manufacturer doesn’t have to tell Toys R’ Us for instance, what’s actually in the product.”
What the Ecology Center is trying to do according to Shriberg is “take a small chunk of filling in that gap, but really trying to spur both state and federal government to action.”
The Ecology Center has been randomly testing toys; they test the toys with an XRF device. The XRF device is a gun-shaped device with a trigger and decked out with flames on the side. The device has been loaned to the Ecology Center since it costs $40,000. The XRF device gives an accurate measure of a products composition and is used by the FDA and throughout big industry to test products.
So far the Ecology Center has tested over 1200 products and found that a third of the products tested have had detectable amounts of lead and other hazardous substances. Hundreds of the products tested had levels above the 600 ppm standard though it was in the plastic, not the paint.
According to Shriber, price was not a factor in which toys had lead. But he does warn that any kind of children’s metal jewelry had the highest levels of lead.
Other things to look out for is lead-glazed earthenware, these are often large decorative coffee mugs. One of the cups a man brought in tested at 2100 ppm, and when Shriber pointed the gun inside of the cup he found low levels of mercury. Though Shriber points out that the toxins could be sealed inside the cup, which is ok as long as it doesn’t get chipped.
Harbut also warns that lead is found in plastic so people should be sure to wipe off their vinyl plastic window shades because they get coated with dust that contains lead that can then easily be ingested.
Shriber and the Ecology Center are sure to be busy as the March 31, deadline approaches for the Lead Commissions deadline on whether the 600 ppm requirement is protective enough for consumers.
The Ecology Center is currently offering to test daycares for $150 for about an hour where he can test up to 50 items. The website for the Ecology Center is: www.ecocenter.org while the phone number is (734) 761-3186
Here is a recent Nation article on this topic.
Mark Schapiro will be speaking at the Ecology Center's Annual Membership meeting on April 10 from 7:00-9:00. The meeting location will be announced soon.
Healthytoys.org
Michigan Network for Children's Environmental Health
By Jason Tafilowski
Monday, February 18, 2008
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Editorial: Desalination
In January I provided a link to a story that I heard on Marketplace about desalination. Poseidon was the company being profiled. In the report they are expecting "this industry to more than triple its global output over the next decade," and predicting that the price of water will increase at least 5.5 percent a year.
What we all need to be mindful of is that though this is a very necessary emerging technology, we are at a crossroads over whether future water will be a commodity or a public resource.
I'm willing to bet that many of these small start-up firms are banking on the rising price of water and while it would not be good to stifle investment and development in this necessary technology, water is a resource that everybody needs and everyone deserves at an affordable price.
Interestingly enough one of the Marketplace links goes to a website called the Water Desalination Report. They claim to be "The international weekly for desalination and advanced water treatment since 1965," but if you want more information than that, you will have to pay.
We cannot allow water to turn into a commercial commodity like oil. It is too important.
By Jason Tafilowski
What we all need to be mindful of is that though this is a very necessary emerging technology, we are at a crossroads over whether future water will be a commodity or a public resource.
I'm willing to bet that many of these small start-up firms are banking on the rising price of water and while it would not be good to stifle investment and development in this necessary technology, water is a resource that everybody needs and everyone deserves at an affordable price.
Interestingly enough one of the Marketplace links goes to a website called the Water Desalination Report. They claim to be "The international weekly for desalination and advanced water treatment since 1965," but if you want more information than that, you will have to pay.
We cannot allow water to turn into a commercial commodity like oil. It is too important.
By Jason Tafilowski
Saturday, February 9, 2008
InfraGard-Another Step Towards a Surveillance Society
The Progressive reports of a fast growing intelligence network called InfraGard. Over 23,000 private companies are part of a closed network that has privileged access to the FBI and Homeland Security. It is alleged that some of these companies have been deputized and given permission to "shoot to Kill."
Friday, February 8, 2008
More Iran war happenings
Bush told a reporter on Israeli television that he plans to strike Iran.
Also Seymour Hersh was told by Israeli officials to not report that the Syrian site was not nuclear.
Also Seymour Hersh was told by Israeli officials to not report that the Syrian site was not nuclear.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Compact Legislation Snags
As Wisconsin nears introducing legislation for The Great Lakes Compact, Michigan legislators are still struggling with the "assessment tool" that was introduced by Patty Birkholz R-Saugatuck.
The "assessment tool" would regulate in state water diversions based on previous water flow data and fish populations. The "assessment tool" worries environmentalists that fear this is a too simplistic approach to be applied uniformly to all ecosystems in the state.
James Clift of the Michigan Environmental Council who worked on the advisory council that developed the "assessment tool," found that in some stretches rivers such as the Au Sable would be reduced by 22 percent.
In a recent press release Clift said: “The numbers prove that the assessment tool should be used exactly for what it was intended – as a tool, not the sole means of determining whether water users can responsibly pump huge quantities of water from the ground.”
Supporters of the "assessment tool" model fear that too much regulation of water withdrawals would stifle business and agriculture.
By Jason Tafilowski
The "assessment tool" would regulate in state water diversions based on previous water flow data and fish populations. The "assessment tool" worries environmentalists that fear this is a too simplistic approach to be applied uniformly to all ecosystems in the state.
James Clift of the Michigan Environmental Council who worked on the advisory council that developed the "assessment tool," found that in some stretches rivers such as the Au Sable would be reduced by 22 percent.
In a recent press release Clift said: “The numbers prove that the assessment tool should be used exactly for what it was intended – as a tool, not the sole means of determining whether water users can responsibly pump huge quantities of water from the ground.”
Supporters of the "assessment tool" model fear that too much regulation of water withdrawals would stifle business and agriculture.
By Jason Tafilowski
Monday, February 4, 2008
Another Step Towards War
In the next issue of The New Yorker Seymour Hersh confirms that in the September Israeli bombing of Syria, the North Koreans were working with the Syrians in some capacity.
This in and of itself is incriminating enough to silence the Syrians, though, it is interesting that the U.S. and Israel refused to cooperate with the IAEA. The IAEA concluded that the bombed facility was not a nuclear facility.
Raw Story reported that the allegations of the Syrian nuclear facility had been possibly leaked from Dick Cheney, despite their being no evidence of any nuclear material in the area.
The whole incident lends the feeling of deja vu and as Hersh told Wolf Blitzer on CNN yesterday, the airstrike sends "a message for the Iranians that we're coming."
Scott Ritter's prediction of an April U.S. airstrike on Iran seems to be coming true. With any luck Ritter will be wrong for once.
This in and of itself is incriminating enough to silence the Syrians, though, it is interesting that the U.S. and Israel refused to cooperate with the IAEA. The IAEA concluded that the bombed facility was not a nuclear facility.
Raw Story reported that the allegations of the Syrian nuclear facility had been possibly leaked from Dick Cheney, despite their being no evidence of any nuclear material in the area.
The whole incident lends the feeling of deja vu and as Hersh told Wolf Blitzer on CNN yesterday, the airstrike sends "a message for the Iranians that we're coming."
Scott Ritter's prediction of an April U.S. airstrike on Iran seems to be coming true. With any luck Ritter will be wrong for once.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)